home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: news.magick.net!usenet
- From: Shawn Talbert <shawnt@src.usa.com>
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
- Subject: Re: Microsoft Visual C++ vs. Borland C++
- Date: 21 Mar 1996 19:00:22 GMT
- Organization: SRC Vision
- Message-ID: <4is906$bds@news.magick.net>
- References: <4if00u$hdk@news.NetVision.net.il> <4ik6jg$f4e@news.interpath.net>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp8.mfr.magick.net
- Mime-Version: 1.0
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.2N (Windows; I; 32bit)
-
- softbase@mercury.interpath.net (Scott McMahan - Softbase
- Systems) wrote:
- >PS: Of course, Borland version 5 HASN'T EVEN BEEN RELEASED YET,
- >so it's a little hard to form an opinion. It could turn out
- >to be a dog and ruin Borland for good.
-
- In my opinion (after working with it for about an hour) it IS
- a dog compared to 4.51. I was only using the IDE hosted tools.
-
-